Friday, May 20, 2016

B&W DS3 / DS6 Dipole Speakers - A Pragmatic Opinion

B&W DS dipole speakers - The Practical Merits of Dipole Surrounds


The internet is always filled with rage around topics that have strong views.
A lot of extremism exists around Dipoles for Surround use.
The pro-THX clan argue it is 'not Hifi' & the Home Theatre guys argue that HT is all about Dynamics, not just 'Hifi'.

I am hoping to bring a rational opinion here for the common consumer...

My view on Dipole in general:


Yes the DS is not 'HIfi'.
But putting a hifi speaker the best way you can still doesn't guarantee THX class perfection in an HT setup, simply because most living rooms are not THX class listening areas.

Ladies & Gentlemen, once you realise that Dipole speakers were designed as an 'imperfect solution' for our 'imperfect listening areas', you realise that there really isnt much to debate about.

Most people cant leave an empty 1.5 metre gap between their couch & the back wall in a typical 25-30sqm lounge that houses their TV & Sound system.
Many people with young kids or pets prefer to wall mount things for safety.

These constraints require us to adapt the 'hifi' technology to create as capable an experience as possible that resembles what should have been 'hifi'.

So we are creating a hifi quality experience, to the best degree possible, by creating imperfect speakers for our imperfect situation. Two wrongs can sometimes make a right I guess.. ;)

Part of the problem is that dipole speakers are defined as speakers that 'diffuse sound' & make it appear from no particular place.
This textbook definition may seem correct, but it is practically speaking too hollow.

A dipole speaker diffuses sound to remove the overpowering effects of angled tweeters, & not to diffuse the point source location.
Its not that a dipole speaker goes off & you cant tell where its coming from.
It is obvious there is a speaker on the top left/right - it just doesnt distract you or overpower the fronts, & when you realise their duties, you appreciate what they can do.

The B&W DS6 - a well designed speaker:


The DS3 & DS6 are actually very similar sounding for their dipole purposes.
They marry beautifully with any 6 series B&W speaker around.
They go low enough to render all the directionally audible bass clean & clear.
The DS3 goes lower than the DS6 by a fair margin, but for surrounds this is less important once we achieve a good timbre match in the 300Hz-3KHz range.
Their midrange sounds very clean & the vocals very clear even in dipole setups.

The DS3 has a tweeter there to satisfy you if you insist that you were missing out on crucial surround information between 8-16KHz before (come on, really?) & want to use it in monopole mode.

You mean to tell me you were watching a movie & the first thing you notice is that one of the dipole surrounds cant render higher than about 8KHz too well - doubt it..
Most people cant even hear past 12KHz clear enough, & sound engineers don't put in such high treble content in the back channels because they know shrill sounds are very directional & would distract the audience.
High pitch sounds are fronts, medium treble is the centre, & the 1-6Khz range is the predominant one used in surrounds for special effects.

So when a DS6 'diffuses' - no scratch that word, its deceptive in this context - when a DS6 reduces the 'directional overpowering characteristics' of the sound, its allowing you to be less distracted by individual pieces of sound & more immersed in the audio image, like the audio recording would have wanted you to.
And I like to stress this - By using dipoles you are getting a listening experience that the audio engineer possibly wanted you to have.
That experience may not have been as good on your standard hifi bookshelf which you have directional tweeters pointed at you in your average living room & create a audio image far different to what the artists intended.

If you think about it this way, you realise that dipoles do have a place in the hifi world.

If you are in an imperfect listening environment where you cant place full range speakers correctly, or are in a room too small to allow creating an envelope using hifi speakers, then I definitely recommend the B&W Ds6 & DS3 dipole surround sound speakers as satellites.
Even if your room has the space, get he DS as they are easier to get right, they will not disappoint.

B&W VM1 - Horizontal & vertical speakers

B&W VM1 - An Amazingly Good Centre Speaker!


I couldn't believe my ears when I heard this speaker.
On the outside, I wasn't expecting much because I normally find speakers with flat baffled enclosures to not deliver great sound.

The VM1 was designed to complement modern flat panel TVs so they are long & flat, but not deep.
I normally find such speakers to be quite poor, so I was very impressed with what I heard.

The VM1 can be mounted vertically, or horizontally.
I was particularly impressed by how well it worked as a centre channel in HT use partnered with the B&W 686.

What really intrigued me is that the VM-1 & LM-1 are theoretically supposed to be identical speakers, with the same drivers in only a different enclosure. Yet the VM1 somehow stands out vocally.
And thats despite it being a flat enclosure, & the LM1 being a rounded baffle.

The VM1 vocals are crisp & it has a lot of detail in the bottom end.
Its a 2 way speaker but doesn't have the muddiness I often complain about with centre channels.
The VM1 wont go as deep as anything new like a HTM62 but thats perfectly fine, its not the target competition.

If you were on a budget, & owned B&W 6 series bookshelves, I would highly recommend buying these second hand for around $100 they are a steal.

The LM1 is also a great speaker, but a tad out of place for centre channel use as it cant be laid flat down, & wont look good laying flat down.

If I had a choice between a VM1 & LCR3 - which the VM1 reminds me of, then I would go with VM1 for small bookshelves & LCR3 for bigger 3 way floor standers.

I wish B&W make a new Vm2 - There is surely going to be a target market for it.
At least the market that the poor M1 left out on!

B&W M1 Theatre speakers

B&W M1 - Looks a million dollars, sound, not so much.

Sorry dear B&W but this speaker is going to get a little bit of slamming, please take it as constructive feedback & not hate speech because I like 99% of what you deliver.
And it saddens me more than you realise because this is the first B&W speaker that disappointed me!

If you want to buy a BOSE but instead want B&W written on it, then get these...

These satellites look awesome, they are built exceptionally well, internal metal bracing & weighty build.
Sliced paper & damped polymer 4 inch driver.

You think youre about to be blown away, but instead you wonder if the speaker is blown!
Gutless, low sensitivity, poor frequency range & missing the classic B&W midrange vocals.
Sadly the sliced paper cone woofer doesnt even deliver as good a bassline as the LM-1 that they were meant to replace!

I think most people will agree that B&Ws key strong point is that their speakers deliver fantastic imaging in the midrange region, this is why we buy their speakers time & again.
These speakers lack the B&W signature sound - then why would you buy them..

I cant help but wonder if B&W get the M1s made elsewhere at some OEM company in China & just put a B&W badge on the grille...

The Aluminium housed PV1D sub is the star of the show aesthetically, but Im not reviewing it in this post because the M1 & the Sub are sold separately & can be purchased for use in your system.

The overall frequency response is really lacking below 100Hz - now you might say thats the design, but why have such a design?
If the LM1 could deliver 70Hz so well that it felt like you were actually listening to a monitor rather than a satellite, why not improve on that with the M1?

Just because satellites are being made by one & all doesnt mean B&W has to follow suit & make a dinky little 'Sony Home Theatre in a Box' equivalent satellite speaker & start pushing them out.

I really hope an M2 is in the works Bowers & Wilkins - And Im sure you wont repeat your mistakes.
I had high expectations from the M-1 because I appreciated  the LM1 & VM1so much.

Please give us back the sound we love, even if it means making a speaker just a little tad larger.
Thanks B&W!





B&W WM2 - More than just a weather proof monitir!

The excellent B&W WM2


For a while, the best B&W budget speaker has been a second hand B&W 601 S2/3, however the WM-2 is a real contender for the best of the small speakers B&W make.

Let me tell you more about this hidden gem.
Whilst sold as a weatherproof outdoor speaker, the WM-2 is very capable indoors.
Its tweeter is not a aluminium dome nautilus tube design, its the cheaper plastic tweeter that B&W use with their 'solid' series & the LM-1 etc

However, the midbass units in the WM2 are not the same as the LM1 or VM1, despite the similar naming initials.
The LM/VM use a 4 inch paper cone speaker.
The WM2 uses a 5 inch kevlar re-inforced cone that is similar to the newer 600 series!
And this makes a lot of difference.. in base but more importantly in midrange vocals.

You get from the WM2 the same warm vocals that you get from a 600 or a 601.
The speaker cone can be pushed a bit without risking distortion.
I gave it a +6db of bass increment & the results were excellent - it handled perfectly.

The speaker has a small footprint but is ported - & that tells us that the driver is capable of moving a lot of air, thus a reflex design was chosen & it worked well.

The outer rounded rectangle appearance make the speaker look like something designed to hang outside a shop or in an open ground.
But if you are happy to live with industrial looking speaker brackets, the rest of the design is quite sleek & very usable at home.

My only feedback is that they should have paired it with a slightly better tweeter, so that the treble was more smooth & went higher up.
It appears this speaker needs to be crossed over lower than other 600 series speakers, & this does seem to affect the sound.
Perhaps changing the crossover frequencies slightly would have made some difference but I wont comment on that as I am not the designer - Im sure they did their best with the componenets.

I also wish they would have release the WM2 under a sibling model, like IM2 - same speaker but with slightly better outer materials, or colours even.
Its simple plastic housing does tend to give away some of the sophistication B&W customers would get with speakers like the LM or VM, & definitely with the 600 series.

But other than that, get a WM2 - it is currently the best small speaker by Bowers & Wilkins.